How are short bones best described?

How are short bones best described?

• A. As long and slender
• B. As shaped like a cube
• C. As flexible and lightweight
• D. As thick and solid

Answer: (B)

Short bones are best described as shaped like a cube. This characteristic is significant because short bones, which include the bones of the wrist (carpals) and ankles (tarsals), typically have dimensions that are roughly equal in length, width, and height. Their cubic shape allows them to provide stability and support while also allowing for a limited range of motion. In contrast, long and slender bones, such as the femur or humerus, are designed for leverage and movement. Flexible and lightweight bones would better describe structures like certain cartilages rather than short bones. While some bones can be thick and solid, this description typically pertains more to certain long bones or irregular bones, not specifically to short bones. The cubic shape of short bones is what distinguishes them in form and function, making this the most accurate description.

Short bones are best described as shaped like a cube. This characteristic is significant because short bones, which include the bones of the wrist (carpals) and ankles (tarsals), typically have dimensions that are roughly equal in length, width, and height. Their cubic shape allows them to provide stability and support while also allowing for a limited range of motion.

In contrast, long and slender bones, such as the femur or humerus, are designed for leverage and movement. Flexible and lightweight bones would better describe structures like certain cartilages rather than short bones. While some bones can be thick and solid, this description typically pertains more to certain long bones or irregular bones, not specifically to short bones. The cubic shape of short bones is what distinguishes them in form and function, making this the most accurate description.